BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 8 Apr 2009 15:34:45 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
>>If the chance of queen loss was 15% in a single queen colony, then the 
>>chance of both queens being or going bad in a two queen one might be as 
>>low as 15% of 15% or 2.25%.  YMMV, though.

> This might be stretching--math vs field reality.  Do you have actual field 
> results, rather than mathematical theory?

Read it again.  I said *might be* and YMMV i amending my original number, 
which is prolly closer to real world since it yields a 5% to 7% loss.

In practice I do not have enough measurements to prove anything, but I do 
know that wintering loss is very low when good hives are combined by a 
knowledgeable crew or in two-queen colonies that are wintered with the 
excluder pulled -- and in my area.   I know nothing about generalities, only 
the specific cases I observed. 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2