BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 12 May 2003 13:36:46 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Jim said;
Once someone explains the process, the result will be a slam dunk.

I hope you are right!

 Instead of trying to slip ultra filtered honey by the FDA I rather suspect
a move will be made to get the blessing of the FDA for ultra filtration.

The ultra filtration question comes at a excellent time with honey being on
a three year watch program by the FDA.

With a mass spec machine honey which has been treated with DI filters still
contains traceable amounts of DI earth but yet the process has the blessing
of the FDA.

Water is water and the fact that Jim suggests that the remaining 18.5 %
water after ultra filtration may not be the original water will not carry
much weight when looked at carefully in my opinion.

I most hardily agree with Jim that the reasons for using ultra filtration
are to hide problems or improve poor quality  honey.

bob

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2