Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 26 Aug 2013 11:28:35 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Many thanks for your post and information. My sample is small, but perhaps interesting.
Weather during treatment was unusual for Virginia- mid to low 80's for the week of treatment which was a big reason I decided to treat when I did and with MAQS.
I sampled in late July using alcohol shaker/300 bees. Out of about 20 colonies, 2 of the colonies had counts over 20, one over 15. I treated all colonies. (which are 2D1M) with 2 MAQS pads. Most were under 1 year old pads. I sampled these same 3 that had the high count yesterday (about one month post treatment) and found 6-7 mite count. Decided that was not going to bode well for the future and treated them again with something else.
I have not finished checking the other colonies except for a few. Colonies that in late July tested 10 and under mites in the alcohol shaker had 0-2 mites yesterday.
My conclusion is that MAQS has worked well in the colonies with "reasonable" mite loads. In the ones with "whopping" (for lack of a better scientific term) the treatment was not enough and a 2nd one I thought was advised.
Not exactly rocket science, but still new information to me. After seeing high mite loads this Spring, I have had to rethink my treatment strategy and hence the post treatment checks.
I find your post on the theory of high temps causing the formic to vaporize too quickly interesting and I wonder if that really could be true. Makes sense to me.
***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software. For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html
|
|
|