BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 1 Apr 2004 23:01:04 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, Hervé
Logé <[log in to unmask]> writes
>I am surprised European on the list do not react more
>than that to what is written about this thread.
Some posts are ignored. One test that is carried out in the UK is on
honey off the retail shelf. You will never know your own honey was
tested until you get that "knock on the door". One interesting example
(which I have quoted before) was the discovery of sucrose at too high a
%. It was further analysed and found not to be from cane or beet sugar.
It was presumed to have come from borage, so the producer was not
prosecuted. In addition whenever the Bee Inspector came to look at hives
last year (s)he took away sample jars of honey for testing. My honey
proved negative to the Chinese problem chemicals - of course.
--
James Kilty

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2