BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 Mar 2011 12:49:41 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
>A word on Conservation. Historically, beekeepers have been 
> conservationists / naturalists.

Good point, and I would not want to give the impression that I do not 
conserve where it makes sense to me or that I don't approve of
conservation or preservation of species and attempting to minimize 
adverse (to us) human impact on ecosystems where possible and 
practical, and where those efforts have an obvious payoff.

My issue was with the claim that an attempt to repurify current bee 
populations back to a supposed ideal historical strain and create 
exclusion zones is "conservation".  To me, it is not.

Nature does not seem to be a conservationist, though, judging by 
what we can observe over time.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2