BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 29 May 2001 08:17:05 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
Barry Birkey wrote:

> > Regardless of individual opinions, recent work with "Robo-Bee" by
> > Thomas Seeley, of Cornell University (and, I am sure, others who's
> > names I do not know) tends to remove what little doubt might have
> > remained about the "dance vs odor" question.
>
> You got me on this one, I have no knowledge of Mr. Seeley's "Robo-Bee" or
> what useful data it gives us.

There is also a mechanical bee experiment discussed in the Hive and the
Honey Bee.  The robo-bee is more recent.

http://www.fonz.org/zoogoer/zg1995/buzz.htm

http://galliform.bhs.mq.edu.au/psy_105/refsig1.html

An excellent article on the dance and other bees is

http://www.sciencenews.org/sn_arc99/4_3_99/bob1.htm

It seems bees do not have a position on any of this, or, if they do,
they have not posted it on the internet.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Me

ATOM RSS1 RSS2