BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 27 Sep 2009 07:31:39 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (45 lines)
It is a while since we discussed microscopes here.

At EAS, there were several microscope sessions, and I noticed that only the 
old, standard types were employed.  Our group in Nick's session had one that 
would not hold focus, but crept whenever anyone let go of the dial.  (Not 
that this is really relevant to anything).

Personally, I have a standard high power microscope and a dissecting scope, 
but frankly the conventional style is not a lot of fun to use.  On the other 
hand, at Baton Rouge, I noticed that Harbo had a microscope hooked up to a 
monitor and we all could stand around and see what was happening on the comb 
he was examining without having to squint, one by one, through a lens.  At a 
Davis open house, Sue had a helper doing a demo with a similar unit, and a 
group gathered around to watch.

So, these things are available, and I imagine myself getting one to hook up 
to my netbook.  I began a search on the 'net for such an item, but the web 
has become a sometimes hard place to find things.  Where once a search would 
turn up only useful pages, now clever imposters manage to insert their 
irrelevant pages into search results in order to get paid for 'clicks'.  It 
occurred to me that BEE-L has a large group of smart people, and someone 
must know the answers I need.

My understanding is that there are even toy models of such scopes, and the 
price should be quite reasonable. Whether or not the toy models are worth 
considering, I don't know.  I do know that in addition to my 'real' high 
power microscope, I have an old $20 microscope from the '60s and it is good 
enough to see nosema, so 'toys' can be better than we might expect.

I imagine there are things to look out for, though, and essential features, 
like depth of field, lighting, durability, range of magnification, zoom, 
etc.

Has anyone here had enough experience with these things to make 
recommendations as to models and sources, and perhaps provide a discussion 
or point out references? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Access BEE-L directly at:
http://community.lsoft.com/scripts/wa-LSOFTDONATIONS.exe?A0=BEE-L

ATOM RSS1 RSS2