BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Oct 2011 16:47:54 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
>
> >Even if half that 6% were non-viable mites emerging during the six days,
> that
> would still require a daily natural drop of around 3% of the total mite
> population.
> That seems high to me under most conditions.  What am I missing?


What I was saying that the 1-hr dusting drop equalled the natural drop that
I had counted for the previous 6 days.  It was merely an observation of the
data, not theoretical.  But let's do the math to see whether it was a
fluke.

Say that there are 100 total mites in the hive, 2/3 in the brood (although
likely half at some times of the season).
So 33 are phoretic.  If dusting causes 34% of these to drop, then about 11
would drop.

Let's compare that figure to see if it would equal the expected natural drop
for 6 days:

 If 2/3 of the mites are in the brood, that makes 67 of the hundred in the
brood.  They will all emerge within 12 days, so about 6 would be emerging
per day.  If 50% of those drop naturally, that is about 3 per day.

So we are in the same ballpark.  Does that help?

 Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2