BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Jan 2019 03:06:10 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
>>>  Pollen content of the honey can indicate where it may have come from,
providing that pollen source is typical of the claimed area.     >>>  ... pollen and nectar can be totally unrelated .

<><><>  I agree but....    The presence or absence of pollen in a honey sample can corroborate or exclude a claim of source for the honey.  Honey that's claimed to be tupelo honey but has no pollen present from the tupelo tree can be held in question.   Which brings in to question, are there quantities of minute constituents which can be detected, maybe separated out, and used to corroborate the source and quantity of a honey source? 
Mike in LA


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2