BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Przemek Skoskiewicz <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 3 Dec 2017 20:51:58 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (19 lines)
The Broodminder sensors that I use come on a thin strip of plastic that is placed on top of the frames and the sensor is smack center over what would be a cluster in a central location. I doubt that it has capability to distinguish humidity depending on a location within a single brood chamber, though I guess nothing stops one from experimenting with the placement.

I hesitate to use the word "crude" to describe the level of measurements possible with these sensors, because they do provide very useful, additional information to a beekeeper.

My comment about the science vs. the old timers was based on the assumption that the level of healthy (or ideal) humidity levels inside overwintering hives has been already established (60-70%?) and a sensor like Broodminder can tell the beekeeper whether he/she needs to worry about ventilation. Looks like I assumed too much, :-(

Przemek

---- randy oliver <[log in to unmask]> wrote: 
> [...]
> Przemek (or anyone else), have you used accurately-placed modern-day
> humidistats to measure relative humidities at various points within and
> without the winter cluster?

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2