BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Kilty <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:38:38 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
In message <001901c37487$cdb2a5f0$e5ad72d8@SOD>, Todd
<[log in to unmask]> writes
>It would appear that the broodless period had a substantial impact on
>total varroa population.  I've also noticed that the queens seem to be laying at
>an accelerated pace, seemingly making up for lost time.
We have noticed periods after a brood break due to poor weather that
mite falls are low. I suspect that they have all charged into the new
brood and later counts will show them higher. One day soon, I will count
my samples rather than assessing them as low, medium (wait) or high
(treat).
--
James Kilty

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2