BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Yarnell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Feb 2002 12:36:40 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (29 lines)
The worst think, in my view, is taking a civil, research based discussion
off list.  We're here because we signed up voluntarily and can either
resign entirely or skip threads which become tedious.

If everyone is careful to accurately label posts in the subject line,
keeping the line so long as its appropriate but chaning it if the subject
changes, as adults we can choose.

The only time the number of posts becomes tedious is when they are
disrespectful flames.  Largely, this list (thanks moderators) avoids the
need for insulated bee suits.


On Sat, 23 Feb 2002, Peter Borst wrote:

> Friends
> I apologize for contributing to the surge of emails lately. I am
> going to remain quiet for a while. If anyone wishes to continue this
> discussion off list, please feel free to contact me:
> --
> Peter Borst <[log in to unmask]>
>

---------------
Richard Yarnell, SHAMBLES WORKSHOPS | No gimmick we try, no "scientific"
Beavercreek, OR. Makers of fine     | fix we attempt, will save our planet
Wooden Canoes, The Stack(R) urban   | until we reduce the population. Let's
composter, Raw Honey                | leave our kids a decent place to live.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2