BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Elias Gonzalez San Juan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 20 Sep 1999 23:39:16 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
Dear Bee-L friends:

 Just as it happened one year ago, the debate about FGMO gets to Bee-L
with a series of messages that lead to no where.  Dr. Rodriguez can't
reply directly to your questions because he is not subscribed to this list.
He prefers to dedicate his scarce free time to work with FGMO rather than
in defending himself from the continuos attacks on his work.

 At this time a new method of application of FGMO is being tested by
beekeepers in USA, and as soon as the test is complete, the results will
be published for the benefits of all. After that, each one of you can give
your opinions of your choice.

 For those of you who base your criticism about FGMO on the fact that
the tests have not been analyzed following a scientific method, let me
remind you that according to the LAWS of physics, some beetles and bumblebees
would not be able fly because their body weight is too large for their small wings.
Perhaps those insects have never heard about those laws because they do FLY, and
very well indeed.

 I ask for a bit of patience until the results on the latest tests are published
and to assume a posture of respect regarding all opinions, be they pro or con FGMO.

 Wishing well to all.

 Elias.

 Canary Islands. Spain.
 [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2