BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Richard Yarnell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 Jan 2001 18:18:00 -0800
Content-Type:
TEXT/PLAIN
Parts/Attachments:
TEXT/PLAIN (29 lines)
For US Beekeepers:

The deadline for comments under this number has passed.  I urge you to
forward copies of the comments you made to the EPA to your
Congressional Representatives.  By the time regulations reach the end of
the public comment stage, institutional momentum is hard to overcome
without some outside help.

If your reps are made to understand that it's not only beekeepers which
are under attack with this proposed regulation change, but crop production
generally, they may well help.

As previously suggested, with the rush to shift as much responsibility to
the States as possible, it is important for you reps to understand the
pollination industry is an interstate industry.

Someone who still has a copy of the original notice may be able to provide
the address at which submission can be read.  That little detail may help
some Reps assistant to look further into the issue.

> [log in to unmask]      Docket Control Number OPP-00684
> Re: Federal Register: November 22, 2000 (Volume 65, Number 226)] [Notices]

---------------
Richard Yarnell, SHAMBLES WORKSHOPS | No gimmick we try, no "scientific"
Beavercreek, OR. Makers of fine     | fix we attempt, will save our planet
Wooden Canoes, The Stack(R) urban   | until we reduce the population. Let's
composter, Raw Honey                | leave our kids a decent place to live.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2