BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Isis Glass <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 30 Nov 2005 19:46:57 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:28:02 -0500, Isis Glass <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>A Scandinavian study reported in the September 2005 issue of Bee Culture

I just want to apologize for posting this reference. I haven't been reading
ALL the posts lately. If I had, I would have known the study had been
discredited.

I hope someone, in New Zealand perhaps, can supply more information on the
small cell tests done there.

I. G.

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2