BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 10 Jan 2006 04:20:04 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (27 lines)
--- Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> The study with which I'm associated doesn't use mite
> drops as a count criteria.  We actually take bee
> samples and do an actual count of mites per number
> of bees; ...

In the article they mention "mite population levels"
and "mite infestation levels",  I don’t see where they
specify the method of how mite levels were determined.
 But I would assume that the method used would likely
have been bee samples rather than mite drops because
this would be the only way to accurately determine
actual mite levels.  For example, counting mites drops
might reflect grooming behavior and researchers would
be aware of this fact.  
   


		
__________________________________________ 
Yahoo! DSL – Something to write home about. 
Just $16.99/mo. or less. 
dsl.yahoo.com 

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2