BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Gene Ash <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Nov 2018 05:19:51 -0600
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (15 lines)
a Jerry Bromenshenk snip...
In the year of 44% losses, that the press was all over the 44% colony loss, which was not true.
 
I did a collation of the BIP data.  I've a spreadsheet  buried somewhere, the 44% applied only to hobby/small scale beekeepers and it was 44% of them who lost colonies.  That was about 30,000 respondents, who lost one or more colonies.   By far, the majority of BIP respondents were hobby/small scale beekeepers.

my comment...
That last comment is interesting since I do not believe most of their customer are anything but larger beekeepers. I have never decided how this entire 'loss' thing is defined. I will add that the 3 (fairly well known) commercial beekeepers who headed up a 'ask the experts' panel at the most recent Texas Beekeepers Association Meeting informed the crowd that their 'replacement' number was about 50%... I would guess the number is higher for pollinators than those who only go after honey.

Gene in Central Texas...  

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2