BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Cushman <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 09:22:12 -0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
Hi Lloyd

> Allen correctly referred to those with stock tested for tracheal mites
> as "queen producers", and not "queen breeders".

Now here is a difference that I have never before fully appreciated...

It explains the vast difference in cost of US/UK queens.

I believe that queens should be 'up to a standard' rather than 'down to a
price'. Breeding in UK is not on the large scale as in US, but it is true
'breeding & selection' with plenty of qualitative testing going on as well.

The problem that I see with Allen Dick's proposed 'benchmark' system is the
natural racial and between strain variances, apart from variability.

Variability is 'future generations' of stock... Might we be blunting the
edge by striving for a prescribed set of standards?


Best Regards & 73s, Dave Cushman
Beekeeping and Bee Breeding Website
http://website.lineone.net/~dave.cushman

ATOM RSS1 RSS2