BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
John Edwards <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Sep 2010 20:09:52 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (24 lines)
How about this... ??
There was brood above the (faulty?) excluder, which was then isolated 
above two new supers,
and/or maybe the excluder was not in place until the two new supers were 
placed.
In either case, the top super is from laying workers (?), and the queen 
failed.
 - OR, the top brood is from a older, trapped, virgin queen.
   - John Edwards

Jim Smith wrote:
> ...
> Above the plastic queen excluder, and in the 3rd (top) super the same brood pattern was found, except it contained less brood. This was above two supers with honey. 
>
>   

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2