BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Deodato Wirz Vieira <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 7 Feb 2000 22:14:00 PST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (29 lines)
Sometimes it has to be said: People miss the obvious

The obvious being missed this time seems to me: It is very expensive to
develop such a system, not to build it
With Allen's wish list being as "small" as it is, has anybody asked himself
how long will it take of research (and with how many hives), under how many
different conditions, and so long, and whatever else, until one knows how to
correlate all the data gathered (let's recall: temperature, sound, bee
count, weight) to get meaningful answers satisfying the wish list? There
lies the expense of development. It will have to be done in collaboration
with the beekeepers (at least some beekeepers), and I don’t believe it will
work on first try, quite the opposite.

As I see it, the problem, the financial side of it, is not the putting
together of all the existing bits and pieces, but the correlation of all the
data into a meaningful whole.

Some questions do come to mind:
How will that system work in hot climates with no winter to speak of?
Who will test it there?
Who will test at all?
Could beekeeper’s associations be of help?
What about university research funding?

Deodato Wirz Vieira

______________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free Email at http://www.hotmail.com

ATOM RSS1 RSS2