BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 24 Oct 2005 13:42:34 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
--- allen dick <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


> My guess was that the higher density of better
> pollination may have been due
> to the fact that honey bees were orienting to the
> huts and using them for
> reference, not necessarily to the activity of the
> leaf-cutters!

An interesting supplemental research would have been
to put other 'dummy' landmarks including unpopulated
huts and then see what the pollination range would
have been.  If there had been similar denser
pollination plots around those other, nonpopulated,
landmarks that would have been an eye opener.

Mike in Alabama






__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2