BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Black <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 24 Jan 1997 17:24:40 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
In message <[log in to unmask]>, BRIAN HENSEL <"[log in to unmask]
"@METRO.NET> writes
> It's sad to see that if a
>person has an idea and they post it here, that they better have a thick
>hide. This is a real shame.
 
and Mick Mayhew wrote;
 
>The lack of
>tolerance displayed recently by a group with a strong common interest
>dismays me......
>I also understand that ideas need to be
>tested properly before we can be sure how effective they are. It seems
>from Pedro's comments so far that he hasn't done enough testing to
>qualify as scientific proof - but has he claimed this?
 
Aren't we being a little over sensitive here ? This is a discussion
list. You will meet opposition as well as support. If you aren't
prepared to encounter and cope with rational criticism and confidently
express your ideas clearly don't post. That's life.
Very often it is only in the dialogue that we refine our ideas so that
we do know what we think !
 
('Fraid I won't be here to argue 'till Monday)
 
--
Dave Black
<http://www.guildford.ac.uk/beehive>,
Guildford, GU1 4RN.  UK.

ATOM RSS1 RSS2