BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM
Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
Re: OLD FASHIONED VALUES
From:
"Dave Green, Eastern Pollinator Newsletter" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 6 Jun 1995 23:55:12 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines) 
In a message dated 95-06-06 23:23:48 EDT, Liz Day wrote:
 
>So, why are you suing the extension people instead of the
>applicators?
>Wouldn't the applicators be the ones to go after first?
>???  (I'm not arguing with you, just puzzled).
 
   How much chance do you think there would be, if the enforcement people
won't cite them, and they are following extension recommendations (even if
they are pre-FIFRA)
 
   The primary defendent here is in enforcement, extension is secondary.
 
 
Dave Green       [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2