BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bill Truesdell <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 11 Apr 2007 15:21:39 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Peter Borst wrote:
> Well, the number that they are citing is "between 650,000 and 800,000". Yes,
> it is based on extrapolation of data. That's what is done whenever the
> actual number can't be determined. 
>   
Not true since it is a biased sample.  You first ask for those who 
suffer from the problem then extrapolate from that? Your result will be 
biased high since most who do not have the problem will not report. For 
extrapolation to work the sample should be random and unbiased. Neither 
are at work here.

Plus, what I asked for is simple- what are the actual numbers of 
reported collapsed colonies and how many are definitely CCD. I think 
those would be nice numbers to know to get some perspective.

Bill Truesdell
Bath, Maine

******************************************************
* Full guidelines for BEE-L posting are at:          *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm  *
******************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2