BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Mar 2012 14:05:28 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
>
> >Risk-sensitive foraging in honey bees: no consensus among individuals and
> no effect of colony honey stores.


Pete, I just looked at the abstract of that study, and don't know that it
necessarily applies to Allen's observation, since the study (as far as I
could tell) didn't pertain to degree of foraging, but rather only the
choice of constant vs. variable-reward flowers.

It seems to me as well that colonies lacking in stores are far more
agitated than those with heavy stores. Can you find any more studies?  This
would be an easy one for Jerry to test with his bee counter and hive scales!
-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2