BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Fri, 11 Nov 2011 12:32:43 +0000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (1 lines)
Queen rearing: bees preferentially choose which larvae to raise as queens, but not based on kinship



The data presented in this study did not

show that relatedness is important for the selection of larvae for queen rearing.



However, different maternal investments into the egg can significantly affect the

chance of the resulting larvae to receive royal treatment or not. Egg weight,

measured as a criterion for maternal investment differed greatly even within clutches

laid simultaneously. Worker bees recruit for specific larvae by a specific behaviour,

the exposure of the Nasonov gland. However, this behaviour is not guided by

relatedness, but in addition to egg size by genetic differences within a colony

assumed to be linked with differences in larvae attractiveness. 



Consequently, genetically or environmentally-driven attractiveness – but not

relatedness – represent the key criteria for selecting larvae for gyne production.



Selection of Larvae for Queen Rearing by Workers in the Honey Bee

(Apis mellifera L.) − Nepotism or Different Maternal Supply?

AL-Kahtani, Saad Naser Saad



             ***********************************************

The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned

LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:

http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html



Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:

http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm


ATOM RSS1 RSS2