BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Charles Linder <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 23 Jul 2016 10:52:01 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (18 lines)
Wouldn't it be the other way around? Start earlier in the North, and later in the South?



Interesting thought,  certainly plausible. I was thinking the exponential growth in mites  would rise sooner in the south as they start brood cycles so much earlier.  I see your point and thought process though.

100% agree on losing and mite numbers climbing.  I see it also.  I tend to suspect there is another factor at play here.  One we are missing.  We do know that late summer brood is less attended  and tends to take a bit longer to hatch which may help Varro,  there may be some climatic event that triggers something.  And it could simply bee the compound interest theory really kicks in.  
I do know Randy is working super hard on trying to put it all together.  He's been kind of obsessed with the math,  while most of us just want to kill the little buggers.  I have a lot of confidence his math is better than mine,  and he will make Varro pop work pretty well.



Charles

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2