BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Allen Dick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 16 Jul 2009 11:05:34 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (17 lines)
> When I've done it I've gone back on the fourth day and broken down 
sealed cells to prevent this. There are usually some.

Since the diet for larvae is the same for the first three days whether 
the end result is to be a queen or worker, and we are using hives that 
are thriving, with lots of young bees, and that are on a honey and 
pollen flow, why would a two or even three-day-old larva not make as 
good a queen as a younger one?

Also, what makes you think that the unsealed cells were not started 
with larvae of the same age as the ones being broken down, only later?

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2