I couldn't post to Bee-L yesterday, Randy helped me out.  
 
The ABSTRACT that I sent and that Randy forwarded is for a paper  published 
in PLoS ONE in January.  It is the SAME method as in Science  paper, but  
with more doses and two chemicals, and a different  interpretation.  The 
paper in Science more or less ignores the existence of  the earlier, better (in 
my opinion) paper.  It cites the PLoS ONE  paper (Ref 14) but then says 
something to the effect that other investigators  have seen an effect on 
foraging, refs (10-14).  Very misleading,  forgetting to acknowledge that an 
earlier, more extensive study, using same  RFID methods, 'scooped' them.  
Unfortunately  the PLoS ONE paper  didn't get any press. 
 
Jerry
 
 


             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm