BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 27 Apr 2011 07:08:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
I posted a couple of days ago that one Calif beek had problems treating
splits with MAQS.  The manufacturer is looking into it.  Following are snips
from our correspondence:


In regards to the issues being experiences with supercedure and brood loss,
 adequate ventilation seems to be the main problem.  I have been told that
beekeepers in California generally run 3/8” entrances as opposed to ¾”
entrances.  MAQS treatment targets the brood area within the hive whereas
Mite-Away II acted as a fumigant for the entire hive.  Increasing
ventilation to the brood area will alleviate the problems being experienced.



It is recommended that beekeepers slide the second storey brood chamber back
½” to create a temporary full width entrance and extra ventilation. The
boxes should then be slid back square and the temporary entrance closed
sometime after the first three days.  This information is on the FAQ that
was posted on our website in early April.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2