BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 9 Dec 2013 20:54:59 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
Dr. Evan Skowronski, a friend of bees and a foe of pathogens, offered this
opinion for the group via email in response to my recent post.  The emphasis
is his, not mine:

"It MAY be possible to develop a method to discriminate between and quantify
GMO vs wild type pollen...but it would require a significant investment not
only in R&D but the all the regulatory steps to make a standardized testing
method (ISO or ANSI)...only to be redone EVERY time a new GMO shows up.  Not
sure there is any there-there in terms of safety, and almost certainly
impossible to keep up testing development and standardization with GMO
roll-outs."

So, when one of the editors of the book "Emerging and Endemic Pathogens:
Advances in Surveillance, Detection and Identification (NATO Science for
Peace and Security Series A: Chemistry and Biology)" says that it "MAY be
possible", that means that it is highly likely that it will prove to be
impossible at any price.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2