BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Juanse Barros <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Jun 2013 22:51:53 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (30 lines)
NonSanto = RR = Roundup = gliphosate

Gliphosate as active principle, quite innocuos to bees
adjuvants ? do not remember de conclution, but looked bad as I recall.

RR, OGM resistant to roundup, bee-wise very disruptive, green deserts are
formed, no pollen available. aplifies what is possible as cultivable land,
since most of "arable" part of equation is taken out by herbicide. Bee
Oasis are left within a rapid expanding Agfrontier.

The cosmetic use of gliphosate (gulf course escenario) is lowering the
nutrition quality of those green corridors between Bee Oasis and within
urban reservoirs.

Could this also be part of the equation when evaluating RR OGM technology?

The no till farming proposal, quite green at its begginings with the
irruption of gliphosate end up being a very owfull combination, since bad
practices of no rotation and excesive/repetitive use of herbicide, produced
a dead soil with resistant weed.

In Praire geographies the temptation triumphed and you have SojaNation in
Argentina, MaizeNation in USA and CanolaNation in Canada as bad examples of
land use when thinking on bee nutrition.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2