BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
James Fischer <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Sat, 6 Dec 2003 16:28:40 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
Yoon said:

> But, here, Dave seems to be referring to the aggressive requeening
> practice, which almost all beekeeping books baptize nowadays--
> that every fall or spring, the beekeeper must requeen no matter what

I had assumed up until now that this was due to the decline in
"drone quality" we have seen.  (Dare I say lower sperm count?)

I do not replace queens that appear to be doing well in terms of
brood pattern and quantity, but I must agree that I have been
forced to requeen more often in recent years, even when basing
such decisions on clear and compelling metrics.

Offhand, I'd guess that I have bought half again as many
replacement queens in recent years versus what I bought
in the early 1990s.


        jim (The Shopping Mall Santa: A strange man wearing
           a disguise who asks children to sit in his lap.)

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2