BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 18 Feb 2003 18:59:40 EST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
In a message dated 18/02/03 05:03:48 GMT Standard Time,
[log in to unmask] writes:

<< I wrote twice to the manufacturers to get copies of the "tests" but they
 did not reply. Has anyone else seen reports of these tests? I have been
 told that no new Section 18 exemptions can be issued in states where
 coumaphos is still effective. >>

I have seen the results of the tests in the manufacturer's printed matter but
don't have it to hand.  From memory the tests were conducted in a number of
countries with varying efficiency between the low and the high 90s in %
terms.  I used it last autumn to give a break from Bayvarol (artificial
pyrethroid) and checking trays under varroa floors in my home apiary the last
few weeks there is a virtually nil drop whereas one untreated hive (a swarm
treated with Bayvarol last May but nothing since) shows a drop averaging
between 1 and 2 per day.

It is a long time since I removed the Apiguard but I still get a whiff of
thymol when conditions are right.

Chris (UK)

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
BEE-L subscribers are reminded to read and follow the
guidelines for posting, which are available online at:
http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2