BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter L Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:52:49 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (14 lines)
> I've been using natural comb for the past 7 years and see a much wider range in worker cell size than 5.2 to 5.4

I did not mean to imply that that was the range, but rather the average, according to Latreille. Which agrees with work done by Marla Spivak in Central America. They used natural comb cell size to differentiate between local Apis mellifera, which have been there for centuries (and seldom are housed on foundation) and the invading african bees, which build much smaller cells, about 4.9 mm average. The range is not at issue here.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

Guidelines for posting to BEE-L can be found at:
http://honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/guidelines.htm

ATOM RSS1 RSS2