BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Mike Stoops <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 17 Oct 2005 07:50:01 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Succeeding With Small Cell    (was,,,              SC
Test 2002-2004 Nor,,,)

--- "J. Waggle" <[log in to unmask]> wrote:


> To perform this test in the
> sterile environment proposed by some of the
> scientists
> would not accurately simulate the effects of varroa
> on
> a colony under common everyday conditions.

If you are testing for the effects of varroa on hives
in comparing today's bee size and the smaller bee size
as grown be Dee Luzby then you have to eliminate all
other effects on the bees and this includes chalk
brood.  You cannot prove a hypothesis on bee size
effects on varroa tolerance and have your data skewed
by the effects of another factor (chalk brood).

Mike in Alabama




__________________________________
Yahoo! Mail - PC Magazine Editors' Choice 2005
http://mail.yahoo.com

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2