BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 22 Nov 2016 06:47:03 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
>
> >Not sure what to think about this, as it sets off my "quackery alarm".
>

It would certainly have been helpful had they been more informative in
their M&M section--I'm surprised that PLOS accepted such a poor M&M.

I am not clear as to the light source for their "standard 12/12 light dark
cycle."  There's a helluva lot of 670 nm radiation in natural
sunlight--suggesting that if the bumblebees had been exposed to a bit of
daylight, that there would be no need to install LEDs in the colonies.

-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2