BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Kerry Clark 784-2225 fax (604) 784 2299" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 21 Jun 1994 09:30:00 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
   Ah yes, the caramilk mystery..
 
 
   Peter:
 
   I did a seminar on microencapsulated pesticides a few years ago, and
   perhaps I could find the information in the archives, but I'm sure you'd
   get a better answer from one of the manufacturers. Microencapsualted
   diazinon was (is?) registered in Canada as a Basudin formulation.
 
   As I recall, the capsules were a polymer formed as a reaction when a
   chemical mixed with the pestcide, came in contact with a second
   chemical as the pesticide was injected into a receiving liquid. By
   adjusting the injection stream size and pressure, the polymer
   concentration, and the polar properties of the 2 liquids as the
   pesticide was injected, droplets of pesticide of the  right size, became
   encapsulated with a wall thickness that resulted in the desired extended
   release.
 
   There were different materials used if the product was water or oil
   based, but the principle was similar. I don't know if there is a
   technique for small amounts. Wasn't someone microencapsulating a pollen
   extract for improving the attractiveness of pollen substitute?
 
   Kerry Clark, Apiculture Specialist
   B.C. Ministry of Agriculture
   1201 103 Ave
   Dawson Creek B.C.
        V1G 4J2  CANADA          Tel (604) 784-2225     fax (604) 784-2299
   INTERNET [log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2