BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Frank I. Reiter" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 21 Dec 2002 19:04:37 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
> Others, who are closer to this beekeeper, have told of stories of
> suing all the bee supply companies for a share of their screened
> bottom board sales.  Most of us have really been hoping that this
> was a joke.  Not.  Apparently the patent was granted on 10/22/02.

I am not a lawyer, but I understand that patents are invalid where there is
"Prior art" - in other words, where the design has been used previously.
Since many people have used screened bottom boards before 10/22/02, a patent
granted on that day for the use of screened bottom boards will not stand up
if contested.

It may still be possible to patent a particular design for screened bottom
boards, if that design is new and innovative.

No doubt there is a lawyer or two on the list who can validate or correct
what I have said.

Frank.
-----
The very act of seeking sets something in motion to meet us;
something in the universe, or in the unconscious responds as if
to an invitation.  - Jean Shinoda Bolen

http://WWW.BlessedBee.ca

ATOM RSS1 RSS2