BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 5 Jun 2018 06:52:17 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (39 lines)
Since you're continuing on this thread Pete, you should have brought up
Ruttner's response to the paper that you cited, in which he expressed his
opinions as to why the project appeared to fail, as well as his criticism
of  the methodology of Moritz used to support the claim of failure.
Ruttner (1991) Biometrical Control of Breeding, Journal of Apicultural
Research, 30:2, 113-114,

>
> >However, other species have learned to survive and thrive by fitting in
> to available niches


Species don't "learn."


> ,>so it isn't always a pitched battle for resources


It is ALWAYS a pitched battle for resources.  If it weren't, there would be
no more than a single species on this planet.


> >. Nature also succeeds via opportunism, chance, and luck.
>

Nature doesn't "succeed"--it just is.  Certain genetic combinations may be
temporarily successful at exploiting certain niches.


-- 
Randy Oliver
Grass Valley, CA
www.ScientificBeekeeping.com

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2