BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Bob Harrison <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 25 Sep 2005 18:23:35 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (31 lines)
>Keith said:
I never said I did not need smoke I said I no longer use smoke, in simple
terms there are better ways to manage bees than with smoke.
Please call first and get your facts straight;

I guess I misunderstood what you meant but here is exactly what you said in
your post  9-21-05 6:48 AM.

"My smoker is now amongst other items in my beekeeping museum collection to
be handed down in antiquity"

"I wonder how many other useless beekeeping items there are in the world of
beekeeping"

I never met a commercial beekeeper that did not keep a lit smoker around
when working yards of bees.

Even suggesting new beekeepers might work their hives without the use of a
smoker causes me concern. To late to light a smoker after the bees get riled
and serious stinging has began. I ALWAYS teach new beekeepers to smoke a
sting (even in a suit) to mask the alarm odor.

If you want to work your bees in the nude (we have a nudist beekeeper in our
club) or without smoke or protection is fine with all on the list. I worry
about the newbeeks!  I for one do not consider the smoker an obsolete piece
of equipment.

Bob

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2