BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 7 Apr 2009 08:06:11 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (21 lines)
Thanks.  I think this approach is not all that radical.  Of course the 
problem, as is often the case in beekeeping, is that one beekeeper can 
decide whatever he/she likes, but the ability to achieve that depends on 
what the neighbours and passersby are doing.  Although some advocate strict 
regulation, bordering on fascism, beekeepers, being beekeepers tend to 
ignore regulations where they can, making many good ideas impracticable.

...(b) Practise "primitive" beekeeping as is the case in Africa by allowing 
natural selection processes to determine which are the most significant 
characteristics for selection and not the beekeepers or bee scientists, at 
least to some extent. It is also best to use an un-manipulated wild 
population, and for this population to be as large as possible.

Does this include in your view, repealing the prohibition against 
non-movable frame hives? 

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned 
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2