BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
randy oliver <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 24 Jul 2008 10:00:39 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
>
> Dean asked: how is research done on "dinks" applicable to strong production
> hives?
>

When one gets rid of all the dinks, there are no sick hives left to figure
out what went wrong with them.
In my own research, dinks may be kept for comparison.  In my nosema test
yards, I have two universities comparing the differences in pathogens
between the dinks and the thriving colonies.

I lose money on the dinks.  I lose money by not treating all colonies for
nosema and mites.  I'm letting nosema infection run its course in one
yard--I lose colonies.

Colonies in tests can't go to almonds if that adds a variable, or if they
are too weak due to testing a treatment.

Right now I'm looking for colonies with high mite levels, so that I can
answer a sugar dusting question.  If I allow some colonies to reach high
mite levels, there is a good chance that those colonies will later die.

The reasons above are why it is necessary for government or universities to
perform some bee research--it is often costly for an individual beekeeper to
take the loss of income involved.  I know well.

Randy Oliver

****************************************************
* General Information About BEE-L is available at: *
* http://www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l/default.htm   *
****************************************************

ATOM RSS1 RSS2