BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Scot Mc Pherson <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 15 Oct 2005 11:12:30 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (12 lines)
  >That didn't happen.  Two magazines got conned,
   >and so did an entire national beekeeping group.

If as he said his group peers were informed and able to review the material before printing, and unless he signed a non-disclosure or other binding agreement, he is perfectly within his rights to submit his own material for publication. If his results differ from the larger group, then I also think it is important from a larger perspective to have the individual results. Exceptions are often important and not necessarily random or spurious, and knowing the exceptions gives us all the chance to review all data.

Scot Mc Pherson
McPherson Family Honey Farms
Davenport, IA
Bradenton, FL

-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/bee-l for rules, FAQ and  other info ---

ATOM RSS1 RSS2