BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Ruary Rudd <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 18 Sep 2013 09:02:46 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
Big operation large budget, yes if I had that facility I would still use PCR
as it gives definitive result.

Randy did qualify his observation. Fries who originally did not that that
the two species could be discriminated by light microscopy later changed his
opinion on the matter, but did say that experience in looking at thees was
needed before the discrimination could be made.
Ruary

-----Original Message-----

In the UK, the scientists at the Ministry's lab at York, who have
undoubtedly 'got their eye in'  still send samples for DNA analysis for
confirmation.

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2