BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tim Vaughan <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 21 May 2003 20:59:21 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (26 lines)
<<

In message <[log in to unmask]>, Tim
Vaughan <[log in to unmask]> writes
>To treat just one hive or two will just result
>in reinfecting the hives you treat now a few months after treatment.
That's the fantasy. How about re-queening the fast build-up colonies
with daughters of the slow build-up ones.

>>

One could do that if one is willing to forget several normal harvests. But
I don't have any philosophical or religious hang-ups with using chemicals.

I treat once a year for mites, and I get lots of honey. I don't believe
that Varroa resistance will out pace technology. Not that I disagree with
selective breeding, indeed I practice it, especially with gentleness. But
one of the problems that those of us on the front line facing AHB is that
we are under very real pressure to keep our bees gentle, and that is my
priority. In the mean time, I use chemicals to keep the mites under
control, and they work fine.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2