BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Dave Black <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Date:
Tue, 16 Aug 2005 19:37:12 +1200
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (33 lines)
You might find this report, from the Australian NSW Rural Industries
Research and Development Corporation in 2003, interesting in this respect.
In essence (but read the report), the answer is thirty (30) days.

http://www.rirdc.gov.au/reports/HBE/03-049sum.html

Rather than surviving introduction, I wonder about the long term performance
of the queen, especially if she was from a mini-nuc that restricted her
capacity to lay. More work to be done I guess.

Dave Black
Otanewainuku, New Zealand.

www.thebeegardens.com



> -----Original Message-----
> From: [log in to unmask] [mailto:[log in to unmask]]On
> Behalf Of Predrag Cvetkovic
> Sent: Tuesday, 16 August 2005 03:42
> To: [log in to unmask]
> Subject: the best moment to remove yang queen
>
>
> I have a question concerning removing yang mated queens from small nucs.
> What is the best moment to do that?
>

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2