BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Loring Borst <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 4 Mar 2015 19:16:23 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (23 lines)
What these people do, is to flat out ignore any unbiased studies, such as this one. 

In recent years, there are growing concerns over pollinator declines and global pollination crisis (Potts et al. 2010a). However, scarcity of long-term data on the status of domesticated and wild pollinators, in particular bees hampers attempts to evaluate trends in wild pollinators’ abundance and diversity (National Research Council 2007). In the last few decades, the number of domesticated honey bee colonies declined in some central European countries, but increased in other countries (Potts et al. 2010b). Overall, the global stock of domesticated honey bees is growing more slowly than the agricultural demand for pollination, stressing the global pollination capacity (Aizen and Harder 2009). 

As for native pollinators, studies have shown declines in populations of some bumble bee (Bombus) species (Cameron et al. 2011; Colla and Packer 2008; Goulson et al. 2006), while other bumble bee species have shown stability or even expansion in range (Williams et al. 2009). Studies on long term trends in the status of pollinator species other than honey bees and bumble bees are scarce. 

Among these few studies are that of Biesmeijer et al. (2006), who demonstrated significant declines in native bee populations, other than bumble bees, in Britain and the Netherlands, and of Burkle et al. (2013) who found an extinction of 50% of the native bee species in Illinois forests, as well as subsequent degradation in bee-plant interactions in these communities. However, a comparable study by Bartomeus et al. (2013) did not find such significant declines in other regions of the northeastern United States. The status of wild pollinators in most other regions around the world is largely unknown.

The main drivers for pollination decline are agriculture intensification and the subsequent fragmentation and loss of habitats, as well as introduction of non-native species and indirect effects of global climate change. 

Sapir, Y., Dorchin, A., & Mandelik, Y. (2015). Indicators of Pollinator Decline and Pollen Limitation. In Environmental Indicators (pp. 103-115). Springer Netherlands.

* * *

This clearly demonstrates that there is no consensus on pollinator decline, that honey bee colony numbers are rising, that any decline in wild bees could be accounted for by loss of habitat caused by the expansion of agriculture area to meet expanding food demand. Human activity has a negative impact on almost all wild populations; populations of domesticated species are increasing, albeit slower than demand.

PLB

             ***********************************************
The BEE-L mailing list is powered by L-Soft's renowned
LISTSERV(R) list management software.  For more information, go to:
http://www.lsoft.com/LISTSERV-powered.html

ATOM RSS1 RSS2