BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Reply To:
Discussion of Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 3 Mar 1998 17:15:22 CST
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (35 lines)
A somewhat tongue in cheek response to the thought that organic honey
means no contact with apistan/mineral oil and so forth might be as
follows:
Consider that commercial airlines have chemical toilets. Sometimes "blue
ice" chunks fall off of planes and land (with amusing results if the
landing place is someone's home).
What would happen to "organic farming" if we could not certify any farm
as organic unless it could prove that no airplanes ever flew overhead?
It would seem that we should note:
 
1) Organic with nothing used to treat varroa and from a pure forage
location. Evidently this honey could also be marketed as "African honey"
because it can't be done in the continental US or Europe.
 
2) organic (with no treatments added- presumably honey from a dying hive if
located in the US or other varroa-infested country).
 
3) "organic" but using mineral oil or some other food-grade product
 
4) "unheated and unfiltered honey" (for those who want to use the stuff for
their allergies)
 
5) "unheated but filtered"
 
6) regular heated filtered honey.
 
It's assumed  that 4, 5, and 6 may have apistan on when there is no
honey flow.
 
what do you think? Is this a reasonable division of consumer
preferences?
 
Phil
[log in to unmask]

ATOM RSS1 RSS2