BEE-L Archives

Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology

BEE-L@COMMUNITY.LSOFT.COM

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Peter Dillon <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Informed Discussion of Beekeeping Issues and Bee Biology <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 31 May 2004 19:12:15 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Reading Bob Harrison's comments regarding the Imidaclopride saga.

I do not wish to go into any detail here - previous mails sum up my
position, but will comment in the following manner.

I have seen "healthy" colonies that were placed onto a sunflower crop
treated with the forenamed material "disappear" - the same colonies just
previously harvesting totally satisfactory Sweet Chestnut honey in
unpolluted forest areas covering several thousand hectares.
Colonies remaining in the Chestnut areas to collect Honeydew remained in
a normal condition - those transported down to the Sunflowers were ruined.

I suppose that it could be the transportation procedure that was the
root problem!

Also, having spent time and money on this situation over several years
now - no other hypothesis has been forward that covers an adequate
explanation - except the common factor is the presence of the molecule
Imidaclopride.

Agreeing with Bob - it would be wonderful to remove this problem once
and for ever.
When the large proportion of farmers are using a toxic material, the
choice of moving colonies to another farm away from its influence are
not present.
Regards,
Peter

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
-- Visit www.honeybeeworld.com/BEE-L for rules, FAQ and  other info ---
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2